← Search

Eleanor Cooper

NAPA, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 24W–17L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Eleanor Cooper to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-06-11 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-05-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-15 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-10 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Penny Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18AW4.0A · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-03-20 · Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa · #1 Doubles · with Deirdre Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-20 · Vintage Volleyers/DeBord/Napa · #1 Doubles · with Deirdre Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Farver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-01 · NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Farver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.1% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.3% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
10%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer