← Search

Laura Schenkelberg

— year-end
52 matches · 20W–32L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Laura Schenkelberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-09 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jertberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Desieyes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff McCormac mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Erik Jertberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · RIO DEL MAR 40MX7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pete Kinkead mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Muhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kotim Pak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.5A-DT · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-07 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kotim Pak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-29 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kotim Pak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-22 · MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.5A-DT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Kong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-17 · MORGAN HILL TC/MORGAN HILL TC 18AW3.0A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Valone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.9% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 41.9% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.8% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.1% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert