← Search

Jennifer Larson

Tallahassee, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 81W–99L · seasons 2015–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-07-24 · Bartens · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · Bartens · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-09 · Bartens · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
Jessica Bryant - (DQ)*
2026-06-04 · Bartens · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · Bartens · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · Bartens · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · Jahn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mariela Bartens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-11 · Bartens · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · Bartens · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · Jahn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Cady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Carson Parker / Jeanne Dimitri
2026-02-25 · Bartens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen de Cardenas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-21 · Jahn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mariela Bartens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60.5%
46W–30L · 55.2% of games
4.0
6.2%
1W–15L · 39.7% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.1% of games
7.5
57.9%
22W–16L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
17.6%
3W–14L · 40.6% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
35 matches
#1 Singles
16%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer