← Search

Cheryl Clayton

Ridgeland, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 45W–16L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Clayton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
2026-08-23 · Clayton, Cheryl · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Dottley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · Gibson, Anne · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wanza Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-03-06 · Gibson, Anne · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wanza Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-12 · Moak, Jeanne · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Teresa Dottley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-10-05 · Moak, Jeanne · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · Moak, Jeanne · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Crisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-17 · Moak, Jeanne · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sheila Haynes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-14 · Scott, Kathy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wanza Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-03-30 · Scott, Kathy · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wanza Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-03-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Mc Intyre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-03-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Rushton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Rushton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 59.3% of games
7.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 53.5% of games
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal