Eric Spivack
Key Biscayne, FL
95 matches · 62W–33L · seasons 2020–2025
Captains: add Eric Spivack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history95 matches
W
Chuck Snow / John Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Stuart McCroskey / Carter King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
William Hobbs / Brian Rowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Nevena Arsic / Naveen Chennupati
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
Susan Powell / Adam Decker
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
Lindsey Genter / Andrew Bolyard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Anthony Forgey / Leigh Gorman
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2025
1 MAC Messmer 8.0
3 Willow Oaks - Steele 4.5
MAC Meyer - Barefoot 9.0
MRTC Battery Park - Spivack WKEND
1 MAC Snow
1 MAC Snow
1 MRTC Battery Park Spivack
4 Westwood Harris
Belmont Spivamone - Spivack
Hermitage-Berens 9.0
MAC Captain Morgan's Stand
MAC Snow
MAC-Captain Morgan's Stand 8.0 Mixed
MRTC Battery Park Spivack
MRTC WILLIAMS
1 MAC Snow
2 MRTC Battery Park Spivack
3 MAC Snow
3 MRTC Williams/Arnold
A4 MAC Huang Road to Victory
MAC Snow (4.5)
MAC Snow (5.0)
MAC-Loos
1 MRTC Battery Park Spivack
4 Belmont Ballistic Arnold
4 MAC Snow/Spivack
5 MAC Snow
6 MRTC Williams/Arnold
MAC-Loos
2 MAC Snow
5 MAC Snow
6 Belmont Ballistic Arnold
7 MRTC Finn
B2 MRTC Finn Battery Park
B7 MAC Talamo 6.5
MAC Snow
MAC Terrell
5 Belmont Bennett
A4 Belmont Ballistic Arnold 7.5
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games
4.5
68.4%
26W–12L · 55.2% of games
8.5
20%
1W–4L · 45.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 62.4% of games
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.9% of games
8.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 47.3% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.