← Search

Jane Covington

Middleburg, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 11W–9L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jane Covington to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-06-08 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-26 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Harrell - MTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-21 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-07 · Harrell - MTC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-17 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-06-10 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2025-04-22 · Harrell - MTC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Himelfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-6
W
Susan Cooke / Angela Tomaszewski
2025-04-15 · Harrell - MTC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daphne Himelfarb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-3
L
2023-06-27 · Middleburg · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheila Harrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Karen Ziff / Kelli O'Donnell
2023-05-30 · Middleburg · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Schierenbeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
55%
11W–9L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 45% of the time
#1 Singles
45%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
3 matches
#2 Singles
10%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer