← Search

Jennifer Shepard

Frederick, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 42W–73L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Shepard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-07-26 · Sacker - Surfing The Net · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Tubb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · Tiebreakers - Reefe (55+ 6.0) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cathy Cunningham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-28 · Sacker - Surfing The Net · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Pinkiert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · Tiebreakers - Reefe (55+ 6.0) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie MacFarlane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-23 · Tiebreakers - Reefe (55+ 6.0) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Christy Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-22 · Sacker - Surfing The Net · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tom Pinkiert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Dickerson 18+ 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · Dickerson 18+ 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Krissie Zenkewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · Dickerson 18+ 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · Dickerson 40+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Mollica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-14 · Dickerson 40+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-29 · Sacker - Surfing the Net · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Tubb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 44.3% of games
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
29.3%
12W–29L · 40.2% of games
3.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 43.4% of games
5.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 44% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams