← Search

Janeen Miklowski

Willoughby, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
167 matches · 77W–90L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janeen Miklowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
L
Jordan Beltavski / Lily Dixon
2026-07-20 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yulia Lyublinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-19 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edmond Manuel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
Sawan Rupani / Catey Peters
2026-07-18 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Raguz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chipo Jolibois
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · A18 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yulia Lyublinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-01 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Chuko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-19 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alexander Khaykin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Zucca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Motoo Saito mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-12 · X18 7.0 2 MV2 Jolibois · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Raguz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-10 · A40 4.0W MV2 Zhang · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Chuko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · X18 8.0 MV Smith · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Motoo Saito mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 44.8% of games
4.0
39.3%
22W–34L · 47.6% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 49.5% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.8% of games
7.0mixed
64%
16W–9L · 55.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal