← Search

Jennifer Witt

CRANSTON, RI
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 22W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Witt to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-07-17 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Pryor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Pryor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 2-1
L
2026-06-26 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Coulombe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-18 · FC: Team Jennis/Donnelly · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Clayburgh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-26 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Allard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2024-03-23 · RP: Witt · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Baalbaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-16 · RP: Curry/DePalma · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steven Diehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 3-5
W
2024-02-10 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Luca mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 3-1
L
2024-02-05 · RP: Curry/DePalma · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Carpenter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2024-01-13 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matt Allard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-01-06 · RP: Witt · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Baalbaki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
Anna Kyriakides / Sarah Collins
2023-07-27 · RP: Witt/Maggiacomo · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 2-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
39.3%
11W–17L · 46.7% of games
4.0
13.3%
2W–13L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.7% of games
8.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 55% of the time
#3 Doubles
55%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
14 matches
#1 Singles
12%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe