← Search

John Bower

— year-end
191 matches · 122W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Bower to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-08-13 · Logan 8.0 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Daniel Katzenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · Tennis Zone · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabriel Raneses
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
W
2026-08-01 · Expendables 8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-30 · Crazy Hazy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · Logan 8.0 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russell Chamberlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-18 · Tennis Zone · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cesar Pernia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-12 · Crazy Hazy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rich Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-11 · Expendables 8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · Crazy Hazy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marion Boone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Crazy Hazy · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Muoio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-28 · Expendables 8 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martin Ramos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · Logan 8.0 55+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Sterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
67.4%
64W–31L · 57.4% of games
4.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.1% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 65.2% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
57.4%
31W–23L · 51.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
45 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova