Nancy Paregien
215 matches · 98W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Nancy Paregien to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history215 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
55%
22W–18L · 50.5% of games
4.0
26.3%
10W–28L · 43% of games
7.0
49.5%
48W–49L · 51.2% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 47.3% of games
7.5mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.2% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.