← Search

Sameer Kadam

— year-end
134 matches · 80W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sameer Kadam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
Mike Perekupka / Jonathan Lu
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Michael Conte championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · SPRING 1/No Strings Attached · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-20 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Cope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · SPRING 1/No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Clayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-06 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-05-31 · SPRING 1/No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yevgen Knyazkov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jaroslaw Chorazykiewicz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Conte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-0
W
2026-04-26 · Matchpoint Mavericks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-04-25 · CENTRAL 2/No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Cope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams8 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
62%
62W–38L · 55.1% of games
4.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
16 matches
#2 Singles
11%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams