← Search

Philippe Ceas

— year-end
11 matches · 9W–2L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Philippe Ceas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
2024-08-05 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with William Brahler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-01 · Northern: Amico · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Arjun Ramakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
N/A
2023-08-07 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Arjun Ramakrishnan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
David Brown / Robert Schmitz
2023-07-30 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Maher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2022-07-17 · Northern: Sportime Schenectady · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tristan Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-07-10 · Northern: Sportime Schenectady · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brian Bowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2021-08-01 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dylan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2021-07-31 · Northern: Amico · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Dylan Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
William Brahler / David Brown
2019-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with David Maher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Alexander van Cott
2019-07-21 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Jeffrey Martin / Ryan Schmitz
2019-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Alejo Calvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
5.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
4 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams