Carol Pelavin
11 matches · 6W–5L · seasons 2019–2020
Captains: add Carol Pelavin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history11 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 4-6
W
Laurie Bauer / Rachel Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
Catherine Barnes / Susan Jennings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Amy Kraselsky / Nancy Weisberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 6-1
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 55.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 73% of the time
#2 Doubles
73%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.