← Search

Rosemarie Rotunno

Anchorage, AK
0.0 year-end
53 matches · 25W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rosemarie Rotunno to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-02-22 · CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/Casamento · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pamela Pedlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-02-15 · CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/Casamento · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Martha Spano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-08 · CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/Casamento · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean MacHiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · CV-Cathedral Canyon/Inder/Casamento · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean MacHiz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2024-07-19 · Stirred but Never Shaken · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alan Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2024-07-07 · Stirred but Never Shaken · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Owens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2024-06-30 · Stirred but Never Shaken · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Owens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-05-07 · Jen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Duclos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-05-07 · Jen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Conita Mullett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2021-07-20 · C & R · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2021-07-06 · C & R · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2021-06-06 · C & R · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecilia Hopper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
40%
6W–9L · 45.3% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 45.4% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 77.4% of games
3.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 61.1% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Female Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
1 match
#2 Mixed Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer