← Search

Selina Huber

— year-end
116 matches · 35W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Selina Huber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
L
2026-05-27 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Genser/Vella · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenn Falik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6
L
2026-04-26 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Genser/Vella · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-21 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Arcadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Polatsek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-25 · MIT:Legends of the Ball:Vella/Genser · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Arcadi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-05 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Olga Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-26 · KH:Glam Slams 3.5:Harned · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Wakim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-16 · FIT:Supreme Court:Palumbo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theodore Huber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-14 · FIT:Supreme Court:Palumbo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theodore Huber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-02-02 · KH:Blazing Queens:Danchak · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-04 · KH:Blazing Queens:Danchak · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Genser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2024-11-16 · FIT:Supreme Court:Palumbo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theodore Huber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
15W–10L · 56% of games
3.5
21.7%
13W–47L · 37.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
17.9%
5W–23L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Singles
28%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert