← Search

Jason Spencer

Vestal, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 22W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Spencer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with D Rizzo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-09 · #4 Doubles · with Matthew Lange championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · with John Mondorf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Howard Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2025-06-23 · BING: Need for Speed · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alan Troidl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Guy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-2
W
2025-06-16 · BING: Need for Speed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren la Padula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-06-09 · BING: Need for Speed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Guy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-06-02 · BING: Need for Speed · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darren la Padula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Lange
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-05-19 · BING: Need for Speed · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Howard Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
50%
7W–7L · 56.1% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 58.6% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 36.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
11 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova