← Search

Madeline Tisdale

— year-end
31 matches · 22W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Madeline Tisdale to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history31 matches
W
2026-03-31 · Hoover Met - Bird/Wallace · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Osborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-02-12 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lizzie Shepherd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-29 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-28 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Causey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-19 · Hoover Met - Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trent Hopton-Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-07 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelley Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-09-28 · Hoover Met - Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trent Hopton-Jones mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-07-29 · Hoover Met- Nace/Bird · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Maloree McDonough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-22 · Hoover Met- Nace/Bird · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cari Hollingsworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-06-23 · West Homewood - Bradley/Bird · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Wendy Nace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-09 · West Homewood - Bradley/Bird · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-01 · Hoover Met - Ingram / Osborn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Graham Minor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
Teams30 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 67.3% of games
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.4% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova