← Search

Chris Moody

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 71W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chris Moody to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-21 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Penn 55s 7.0/PH · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · Dickason/PH 40s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-18 · Bradley/PH 55s 7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ky Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-17 · Dickason/PH 40s 7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
Lisa Mitchell / Robert Mitchell
2026-03-29 · Dickason/PH 40s 7.0X · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tina Moody mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · Bradley/PH 55s 7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-11 · OK/Dickason/40&over3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-07 · OK/Dickason/40&over3.5M · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Henley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-29 · OK/Dickason/40&over3.5M · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with CHRISTOPHER DICKASON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-09-07 · OK/Dickason/40&over3.5M · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Keith Henley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
15W–10L · 52.5% of games
3.5
66%
31W–16L · 56.1% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 57.2% of games
7.0mixed
59.3%
16W–11L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
29 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer