← Search

Jan Gann

McKinney, TX
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
16 matches · 4W–12L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jan Gann to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2026-03-27 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Gehring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-10-03 · McKinney/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Becker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-09-12 · McKinney/Griffiths-Sullivan W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gail Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-25 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leslee Herling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-07 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-03-21 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sheila Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2025-03-17 · McKinney/Mutter W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-03-14 · High Point/Becker W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phyllis Charles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-02 · High Point/Herling W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leslee Herling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-02-24 · McKinney/Mutter W7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Jaberi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-02-23 · High Point/Herling W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-01 · High Point/Herling W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dee Garza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
25%
2W–6L · 43.8% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 38.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
5 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert