← Search

Craig Tumlin

Pell City, AL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 36W–25L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Craig Tumlin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-09-08 · PC Combo 6.5 Tumlin · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with John J Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · PC Combo 6.5 Tumlin · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alex Stennis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · JACKSON · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andy Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-27 · tumlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jimmy Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · JACKSON · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-20 · tumlin · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bob Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · JACKSON · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-10 · Tumlin 55+tri-level (4.0-3.0) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darryl Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-23 · PC Moore · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-15 · PC: Tumlin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · PC Moore · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-05 · PC: Tumlin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Weir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 50.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
92.9%
13W–1L · 68.9% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams