← Search

Chad Freadman

CUMBERLAND, RI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 50W–29L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chad Freadman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
Emmanuel Fridman
2026-08-09 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Ryan Morin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
Philip Smith / Stephen DiChiara
2026-07-14 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Rajabiun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Morin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 4-0
L
2026-06-04 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · FC: Rajabiun/Chisholm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Morin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · FC: Pierce · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Genereux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · FC: Pierce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Genereux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-21 · FC: Pierce · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Genereux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-03-15 · FC: Pierce · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Genereux mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-23 · EB: O'Keefe · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cara Freadman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-21 · FC: Korenbaum/Freadman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Korenbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
65.1%
28W–15L · 51.8% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.8% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 65% of the time
#1 Doubles
65%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe