← Search

Joseph Hawkes

— year-end
110 matches · 56W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Joseph Hawkes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history110 matches
W
2026-08-05 · Rub A Dub Dub (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toby Hawkes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-15 · Rub A Dub Dub (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toby Hawkes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Rub A Dub Dub (Shouldis) · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toby Hawkes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-5
L
2026-06-30 · STL/Damjanovic-Brinkmeyer/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
Peter Kim
2026-06-16 · STL/Damjanovic-Brinkmeyer/40&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-12 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-03-22 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-15 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-01 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-5, 1-0
L
2026-01-18 · STL/Ackermann-Rigby/18&Over4.0M · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-0, 0-1
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 62.1% of games
4.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 64.4% of games
4.5
19.6%
10W–41L · 37.2% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
45 matches
#2 Singles
22%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams