← Search

Lynne F Krueger

— year-end
115 matches · 56W–59L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Lynne F Krueger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
L
2026-08-14 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cindy Giammarrusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-1
L
2026-07-26 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Yoshimura
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · V- LLW Tightly Strung- Kapur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Kaiser-Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-07-12 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greg Siegel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · 7.0 Deuce Busters/Tsai-Amirganian/CSUN · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eric Chaimberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · Moorpark Acing Gracefully Sp26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Giammarrusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-31 · Moorpark Acing Gracefully Sp26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alana Martinez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-23 · Moorpark Acing Gracefully Sp26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Giammarrusco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aimee Alejandre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · Moorpark Acing Gracefully Sp26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Trombley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Brightwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
64.9%
37W–20L · 58.1% of games
4.0
25.6%
11W–32L · 41.6% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.7% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
33 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova