← Search

Laura Lanza

Lewisberry, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
397 matches · 228W–169L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Laura Lanza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history397 matches
L
2026-09-12 · 40 Love Wisehaven - Spangler · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary Spangler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-07-28 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-24 · ODCC - Michels/Beck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Michels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Tammy Miller / Tina Loose
2026-07-22 · ODCC - Michels/Beck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Michels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
Tammy Miller / Tina Loose
2026-07-21 · ODCC - Michels/Beck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marianne Michels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Sandhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-19 · Wisehaven - Myers · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-14 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · Wisehaven Baby Got Backhand - Myer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cydney Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams63 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
30%
3W–7L · 42.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
78W–39L · 55.3% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 45.3% of games
8.0
55.8%
48W–38L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
56.7%
34W–26L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
59.2%
42W–29L · 54.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
189 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
109 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
53 matches
#1 Singles
5%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
18 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer