← Search

Nancy Crim

— year-end
91 matches · 26W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Nancy Crim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shelley Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-07 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shelley Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-30 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Angie Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leslie Cogbill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-25 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kelly Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
Susan Sullivan / Courtney Hendrix
2026-06-22 · Sibley Forest (Catie Connolly)* · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pamela Najjar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
Michele McBride / Kelly Richardson
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lisa Sager Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-13 · Terrell Mill (Leslie Bates)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sherridan Santivanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-08 · Harrison TC (Lisa Link)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Piendel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
45.2%
14W–17L · 50.4% of games
4.5
20%
12W–48L · 40.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#1 Singles
14%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer