← Search

Jennifer Jorgenson

Maple Lake, MN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 6W–30L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Jorgenson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-07-07 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · Jorgenson-Bowles Point Taken · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Schnabel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Jorgenson-Bowles Point Taken · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Finlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Amy Sorrels / Angela Fischels
2026-02-24 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-10 · Townsend/Osberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-27 · Townsend/Osberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-22 · Agre/Andre · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia de la Riva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-02 · BaerenwaldTownsendES2025 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-20 · Agre/Andre · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-18 · BaerenwaldTownsendES2025 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-13 · Agre/Andre · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Harman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
20%
6W–24L · 39.7% of games
4.5
0%
0W–6L · 31.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe