← Search

Linda Toretsky

— year-end
14 matches · 3W–11L · seasons 2019–2019

Captains: add Linda Toretsky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
Kelly Hartman
2019-07-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2019-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with KATHLEEN SOREBO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Eileen German / Antoinette Dozier
2019-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Nugiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Terri Higgins / Grace Ermey
2019-07-17 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deb Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Sue Saragnese / Randi Eisen
2019-07-13 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Zeltt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
Joy Atkins / Kelly Hartman
2019-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Valentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Mary Jo Brennan / Susan Stouder
2019-07-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Zimmermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
Joyce Nylund / Patricia Wyzykowski
2019-06-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Zeltt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Sandra Augello / Debra Bromson
2019-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Brong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
Isabel Fath / Valerie Jones
2019-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Valentino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Kelly Hartman
2019-06-04 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Debra Bromson / Randi Eisen
2019-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Nugiel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Teams2 teams · 2020–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–6L · 29.3% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Singles
14%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert