Ruth Wager
139 matches · 62W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Ruth Wager to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history139 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
45.2%
52W–63L · 50.3% of games
7.0
50%
9W–9L · 52.4% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
17 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.