← Search

Amber Gaskill

Fayetteville, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
75 matches · 32W–43L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Amber Gaskill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Young/Fayetteville/FAC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberly Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Karr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Droke mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Edmiaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anthony White mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-11 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffery Pederson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · Rodgers-Edmiaston/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Gabbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Sarah White / Mark Popejoy
2026-07-07 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Martin Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · Hickman/Fayetteville/SRC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-06-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Spencer Scarbrough mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
68%
17W–8L · 57.7% of games
4.0
10%
2W–18L · 35.9% of games
7.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.2% of games
3.5mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams