← Search

Katrina Fleming

KIRKLAND, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 34W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katrina Fleming to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
L
2026-06-21 · BC-Clemente · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Hasbrook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · BC-Hung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-01 · BC-Landry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Goetzmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-19 · BC-Imus · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kris Stimpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-09-07 · BC-Imus · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-08 · Fingers Crossed · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6
L
2025-07-24 · LOVE WINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Fleischman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-06-16 · LOVE WINS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Adkisson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2025-03-28 · BC-Free Agents-Hung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pauline Snowden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-22 · BC-Failed Experiment-Holm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2025-02-15 · BC-Failed Experiment-Holm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-02-01 · BC-Failed Experiment-Holm · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
41.9%
18W–25L · 45.6% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
8.0
60%
6W–4L · 46.7% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 40.3% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
23 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer