← Search

Rebecca Yeakey

— year-end
135 matches · 70W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rebecca Yeakey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-07-08 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Cook · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
Natasha Evans
2026-06-24 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Cook · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-03 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Cook · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Cook · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-13 · Indy A18 3.5W IRCD Cook · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · Indy 6.5W IRCD Cook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-26 · Indy 6.5W IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-28 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Cook · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Myrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
L
2026-02-07 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Cook · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-17 · Indy A18 3.5W SAT IRCD Cook · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-08 · CIN C 6.5W IRCD Cook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Berggren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-18 · CIN C 6.5W IRCD Cook · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anne Berggren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Teams8 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
59.4%
41W–28L · 58% of games
4.0
50%
11W–11L · 48.4% of games
6.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.4% of games
7.5
43.2%
16W–21L · 45% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 53% of the time
#1 Singles
53%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams