← Search

Patricia Lajoye

— year-end
125 matches · 66W–59L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Patricia Lajoye to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history125 matches
W
2026-09-11 · PTC Quist FWL A18-3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerri Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-05 · PTC Quist WSL A18-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Sodini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · PTC Chandler WSL A40-3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
Cindy Chen / Ingrid Espino
2026-05-16 · PTC Vos WSL A18-3.0WW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leia Vos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-15 · PTC Quist WSL A18-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Kragt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · PTC Vos WSL A18-3.0WW · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Sodini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-4
L
2026-04-22 · PTC Chandler WSL A40-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Krupp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Kim Murray / Jen Tingey
2026-03-20 · PTC Quist WSL A18-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carolyn Kragt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-11 · PTC Chandler WSL A40-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Garber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-10-31 · PTC Quist FWL A18-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerri Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-29 · PTC Chandler FWL A40-3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Volita Vinoski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-10-16 · PTC Chandler FWL A55-7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joan DeMull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams41 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
63%
58W–34L · 55.6% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.3% of games
6.0
25%
5W–15L · 42.1% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 36.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams