← Search

Kema Hicks

— year-end
167 matches · 82W–85L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Kema Hicks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Humphrey/LF/40&over3.0W · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Wilburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-09-01 · Humphrey/LF/40&over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-04 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Wilburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · Melega/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Traci Ladner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-3
W
2026-05-07 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Wilburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · Bryan/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jennifer Bennett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-04-26 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-23 · Melega/LF 55s 7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Whitten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-21 · Humphrey/LF 18s 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melinda Humphrey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · Stuart/LF 65s 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dana Krauss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-18 · Bryan/LF 55s 6.0W · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kate Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.7%
29W–18L · 53.8% of games
3.5
24.5%
13W–40L · 41.9% of games
6.0
71.9%
23W–9L · 58.6% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 50.5% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 53.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert