← Search

Leisa Hollis

— year-end
16 matches · 3W–13L · seasons 2023–2023

Captains: add Leisa Hollis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history16 matches
L
2023-09-21 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Nab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2023-09-04 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cejka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-08-21 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Nab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2023-08-01 · HRCA-N GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Cejka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2023-07-31 · HRCA-N NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Nab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2023-07-06 · HRCA-N AQUA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Nab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-06-30 · HRCA-N AQUA · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cinda Nab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2023-06-27 · HRCA-N GREEN · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-20 · HRCA-N BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-15 · HRCA-N AQUA · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Mary Mathis / Melissa Zink
2023-05-30 · HRCA-N BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2023-05-23 · HRCA-N BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Haberman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams5 teams · 2023–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
7 matches
#1 Singles
25%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match
#2 Singles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert