← Search

Sheila Weiss

— year-end
70 matches · 34W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sheila Weiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
W
2026-05-07 · LWN Volley Vixens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherry Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · LWN Bautista · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Depalo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-30 · LWN Volley Vixens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Travis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · LWN Bautista · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Eriksen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-20 · LWN Bautista · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-09 · LWN Volley Vixens · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Lester
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-08 · LWN Arrington 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ana Bautista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · LWN Arrington 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-02-14 · LWN Arrington 40 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-07 · LWN Arrington 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Perry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-31 · LWN Arrington 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-24 · LWN Arrington 40 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tammy Hallam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
50%
26W–26L · 50.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 49.2% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova