← Search

Chad Bailey

Carmel, IN
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 45W–16L · seasons 2019–2024

Captains: add Chad Bailey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2024-03-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rashid Kourany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2024-02-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yang Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
John Provenzano / John Doe
2024-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Calvert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-01-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yang Xiao
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2023-11-14 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rashid Kourany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-0
L
2023-11-07 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martin Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2023-10-10 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Calvert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-09-26 · CIN Indianapolis, A40&O 4.0 M, Gupta (IRC-D) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
W
2023-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rashid Kourany
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-01-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-01-10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-01-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
72.9%
43W–16L · 55.6% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
15 matches
#1 Singles
15%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer