← Search

Jim Smith

Gulf Breeze, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 83W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
Robert MacHado / Brian Gruber
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Jonathan Llanera championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Thomas Schellin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Thomas Schellin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Naveen Kumar Ramakrishna / Bonifacio Gutierrez
2026-07-25 · #4 Doubles · with Thomas Schellin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-10 · Link - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vladimir Asparuhov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-06-03 · Link - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hunter Stark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · Escambia/Schmidt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · Escambia/Schmidt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Sellars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-04 · Escambia/Schmidt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Sellars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-26 · Tran - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Harrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · Tran - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Judy Harrington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-11 · Bonsignore - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celine Hansford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 58.5% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.6% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.7% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
28W–20L · 54.2% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
7W–8L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
70 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal