← Search

Anne Szczurek

EATONTOWN, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 35W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Szczurek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Love to Play · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucia Marchetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
L
2026-08-26 · Love to Play · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lulu Ablan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-18 · Love to Play · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Fabisak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
W
2026-08-12 · Love to Play · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lucia Marchetta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-08-04 · Love to Play · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lulu Ablan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-02-20 · Bad Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Fabisak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
Susan Manzo / Margaret Larkin
2026-02-13 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sue Fabisak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-06 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hillary Herzig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-30 · Bad Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy McGowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-01-23 · Bad Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Longo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-09 · Bad Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Longo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-09-04 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sue Fabisak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 46.1% of games
3.5
52.2%
24W–22L · 49.7% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.5% of games
7.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.6% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer