← Search

Dina Katz

Chappaqua, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 51W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dina Katz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Elaine Bailenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
Valerie Rickens / Marla Hoffman
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lei Liang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-02 · Mount Kisco CC Matchmakers - 55+ 7.0W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lisa Lampe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Elaine Bailenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lane Bonadies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-12 · CFB: Commanders · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lane Bonadies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-18 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Wrecking Balls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liz SusmanKarp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-02-20 · CFB: Commanders · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lane Bonadies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · with Lane Bonadies championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
Amy Kellogg / David Priego
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lane Bonadies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Laura Dupuis / Matthew Dupuis
2026-01-11 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lane Bonadies mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-11-19 · Club Fit Briarcliff: Wrecking Balls · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joan Veteska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.9% of games
3.5
42.9%
33W–44L · 45.6% of games
4.0
0%
0W–8L · 25.2% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 41.5% of games
7.0mixed
30.6%
11W–25L · 47.2% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
16 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova