← Search

Gordon Barrows

Portland, OR
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 36W–21L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Gordon Barrows to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-12 · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Tanya O'Neil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Brenden Barrows championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Evola championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Andrew Pritchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Pannhara Mam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
Davis Clem
2026-05-30 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Christopher Evola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Kihiro Karasawa / AJ Avansino
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Brenden Barrows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Brenden Barrows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Brenden Barrows
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-04 · THPRD-Rankin 5.0 · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 57% of games
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
22 matches
#1 Singles
26%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
2 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams