← Search

Nan Barash

Bryn Mawr, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
342 matches · 200W–142L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nan Barash to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history342 matches
W
2026-08-24 · Martins Dames · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kate Pitman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · Golden Girls · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rong Nie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-11 · Golden Girls · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rong Nie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Meghann Reddy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Tatyana Kansburg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Meghann Reddy championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
Megan Reardon / Carolyn Strong
2026-08-05 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-04 · Slicing Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelly Rabuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Martins Dames · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carol Hunt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Martins Dames · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joyce Shiau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · Slicing Shots · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shelly Rabuse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.9%
40W–12L · 61.3% of games
4.0
53.3%
96W–84L · 52.7% of games
7.0
81.2%
13W–3L · 59.9% of games
8.0
58.1%
36W–26L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
174 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
8 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova