← Search

Amy Frederick

AUSTIN, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 24W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Frederick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
L
2026-06-29 · Haute Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · Volley Vixens · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lara Luce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · Haute Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · Haute Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natasha Beaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Volley Vixens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Lutostanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-14 · Haute Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcia Lutostanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-23 · Haute Dawgs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-14 · Volley Vixens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-12 · Hot Dogs 3.5 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Sofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-01-17 · Volley Vixens · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-06 · Haute Dawgs · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Hirsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-30 · Haute Dawgs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 43% of games
4.0
28.8%
17W–42L · 44% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0
40%
2W–3L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe