← Search

Adrienne Pilewski

Sylvania, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
459 matches · 227W–232L · seasons 2017–2026

Captains: add Adrienne Pilewski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history459 matches
W
Kettlie Daniels / Mike Williams
2026-08-27 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-24 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Renner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-13 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Dixon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-10 · NWO 55&Over 7.0 MX Kapuscinski-Launchpad · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Pilewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
Mallory Rettig
2026-08-01 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Langsdorf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-30 · NWO 55&Over 7.0W Bloomquist-AW · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W Walton/Nejedlik-SVC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Graff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 40&Over 4.0W Langsdorf-SVC · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rania Eid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · NWO 18&Over 3.5W DAY Pilewski/Modlin-SVC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · NWO 40&Over 3.5W Modlin/Pilewski-SVC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
63.9%
131W–74L · 56.6% of games
4.0
19.8%
16W–65L · 37.1% of games
6.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 54.9% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 62.3% of games
7.5
47.8%
22W–24L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
47.3%
35W–39L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
117 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
113 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
92 matches
#1 Singles
16%
73 matches
#2 Singles
13%
58 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams