← Search

Alicia LaBeau

GROSSE POINTE SHORES, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
101 matches · 60W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Alicia LaBeau to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history101 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Katie Lowe
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · EAST-Klaasen/Mulier 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · EAST-Klaasen/Mulier 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Mattson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-29 · EAST-Lindow 18s 4.0 DW F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Kornmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-24 · EAST-Klaasen/Mulier 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · EAST-Held 18s 4.0 NW F3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tanya Naumenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-22 · EAST-Lindow 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · EAST-Thomas 40s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · EAST-Klaasen/Mulier 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · EAST-Klaasen/Mulier 18s 3.5 NW F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jocelyn Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · EAST-Lindow 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
82.6%
38W–8L · 61.5% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 43.9% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.1% of games
7.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.5% of games
7.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
21 matches
#1 Singles
12%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer