← Search

Holly Jones

Commerce Township, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 46W–37L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Holly Jones to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-07-27 · NAC-Shelar 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Schalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Schalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · NAC-Shelar 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Shelar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-07-07 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Schalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-02 · NAC-Drummond 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-25 · NAC-Shelar 55s 7.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debra Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-23 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Pilat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-06-18 · NAC-Drummond 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gensheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Schalek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-11 · NAC-Drummond 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gensheimer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-09 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Hermann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · NAC-Had 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debra Stein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
61.8%
34W–21L · 50.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 47.4% of games
7.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert