← Search

Gigi Conner

Atlanta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 31W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Gigi Conner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-07-14 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Nay-Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Volpini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
Lynn King / Annie Fukushima
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Kocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariella Tali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-18 · Dekalb TC (Amy Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Richens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · Dekalb TC (Amy Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debra Kocher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-21 · Dekalb TC (Amy Smith)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-17 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Nay-Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-01-16 · Dekalb TC (Cynthia Cassell)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Nay-Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-15 · Dekalb TC (Gigi Conner)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Denise Koo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-08 · Dekalb TC (Gigi Conner)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Langston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
46.9%
30W–34L · 47.5% of games
4.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams