← Search

Kirstin Kraig

Arvada, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
217 matches · 113W–104L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kirstin Kraig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history217 matches
L
2026-07-23 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zac Bergquist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · NJ ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Landmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zac Bergquist mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
Amy Reilly / Merry Logan
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Walters championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Kristin Walters championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzanne Watkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-02 · NJ ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Lochner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-28 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Huelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · NJ TEAL · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Landmark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · Colorado/Stiebeling/MX40&Over8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Huelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
58.3%
74W–53L · 53.6% of games
7.0
75%
3W–1L · 56% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.2%
13W–5L · 58% of games
8.5mixed
40%
8W–12L · 44.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–11L · 30.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer