← Search

Curtis Zeke Totland

Salt Lake City, UT
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 107W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Curtis Zeke Totland to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
Kevin Day / Maribel Alvarez
2026-08-14 · Full Metal Racquets · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zoe Totland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Patrick Sheehan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-07-27 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Novom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · Full Metal Racquets · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Zoe Totland mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · Wasatch Hills-Kester · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with K Handlon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-06 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dylan Wilde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Wasatch Hills-Kester · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with JJ Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Novom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · Wasatch Hills-Kester · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with JJ Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-15 · Liberty Park-Totland/Kester · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with JJ Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-13 · Wasatch Hills-Kester · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with JJ Harrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · Eccles- CJS · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristina Magee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 45.6% of games
4.5
65.1%
56W–30L · 56.8% of games
9.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.5% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 47.5% of games
8.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.3% of games
9.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.9% of games
9.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
51 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova