← Search

Shane Holbein

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 44W–56L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Shane Holbein to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-07-18 · RCW Funnier than 24 - Bookman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alex Kauffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Weitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · RCW Funnier than 24 - Bookman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Logan Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · RCW Funnier than 24 - Bookman · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Logan Kemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · RCW Funnier than 24 - Bookman · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-22 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-15 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Weitzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-11-08 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-24 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with George Georgelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-28 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Kauffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-27 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-09-12 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex Kauffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
75%
15W–5L · 61.2% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 46.3% of games
4.5
21.1%
4W–15L · 40.5% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 56.6% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 23% of the time
#3 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#2 Singles
21%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#1 Singles
19%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams